This article examines the impact of the
judicial trend of interpretive incorporation
on women's rights. The author argues that
this trend moderates the gap in
implementation in cases where human rights
treaties have not been domesticated by the
legislature. She looks to the use of
constitutional interpretation to incorporate
CEDAWs prohibition against discrimination on
the basis of pregnancy. In the course of this
examination the article considers how
interpretive incorporation impacts the status
of unincorporated human rights treaties. The