Journal Citation:
50 OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL, 699-736 (2012-2013)
In this article, the author argues that
one reason violence against aboriginal
women in Canada has not received adequate
attention is because political discourse
within Indigenous communities, influenced
by the way Canadian courts frame
Indigenous issues, has focused on other
matters. The author specifically addresses
the jurisprudence on s 35(1) of the
Canadian Constitution Act, 1982. Section
35 recognizes and affirms the aboriginal
and treaty rights of aboriginal peoples in
Canada. The author suggests that s 35(1)
jurisprudence has focused on land and
resource conflicts at the expense of human
rights issues. Thus, the author argues,
chiefs and leaders within Indigenous
communities have also focused on these
issues, inadvertently drawing attention
away from issues related to violence
against women. As a result of this
concern, the author advocates that
Indigenous peoples' constitutional rights
be re-framed by reinterpreting s 35 to
emphasize issues of gender and violence.
The author therefore presents s 35 as a
potential vehicle for ensuring that all
levels of government, including Indigenous
governments, are obligated to address
violence against women.