Applying a Gender Perspective in the Area of the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief

This paper explores limitations that differ in various jurisdictions on the right of women to practice their religious beliefs, or be compelled to practice other religious beliefs. In section II(1) this author assumes the rational choice of an adult woman to undergo FGC and state interference. She notes that there could be a risk of harm external to the woman, such as future, unborn children or spouses and partners, which she feels may justify a "harm based" limitation, but failing which she feels that a rational decision to have a FGC performed should be outside the realm of governmental interference. [Descriptors: Reproductive Rights - Female Genital Cutting, International]