Journal Citation:
16(2) CHICAGO JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 553-590 (2016)
This comment seeks to develop a
progressive definition of the term "woman"
in the Convention on the Elimination of
All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
(CEDAW). This author notes the
indeterminacy of the term "woman" in CEDAW
and argues that the term, as it is used in
CEDAW, is inclusive of trans individuals.
The expansion of the definition would
extend CEDAW's protection to the
historically marginalized group of trans
individuals. The author argues that
"woman" as used in CEDAW encompasses
biological, anatomical, genetic, gender
performance, and/or gender identity
definitional grounds. Further, the author
asserts that the inclusion of trans within
the definition of the term "woman" in
relation to CEDAW is fully consistent with
the current treaty interpretation rules
and with the interpretation of similar UN
human rights treaties. The author
concludes that a definition of the term
"woman" in CEDAW does not allow for the
exclusion of trans individuals.