Journal Citation:
13(2) THEORETICAL INQUIRIES IN LAW, 323-360 (2012)
This article explores the tension between
the standards in the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW) and identity-based
legal regimes on family law, which often
discriminates against women. The authors
use the CEDAW Committee's initiative to
adopt a General Recommendation on the
Economic Consequences of Marriage and De
Facto Relationships and Their Dissolution
as a case study. This Recommendation aims
to address women's rights in the context
of the gendered and unequal economic
consequences of family relations and their
dissolution. The authors argue that
international law, particularly Article 16
of CEDAW, can provide a framework for
protecting women's rights while still
maintaining community and state identity.
Overall, the article advocates that
states' noncompliance with Article 16 must
be addressed and that all states must
commit to implementing all of CEDAW's
articles. The authors suggest that the
aforementioned General Recommendation
provides language states can use in
revising their family law. The article
concludes by presenting a sample law,
which complies with CEDAW and still allows
room for community identity.