Journal Citation:
12 AUSTLRALIAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 265-78 (1992).
This article explores the underlying assumptions on which the rules of armed
conflict are based, exposing the myth of gender neutrality. It reviews the
changes brought about by the recognition of the legal right of self-determination.
The author suggests that recognizing the absence of women's voices in
decision-making regarding the use of force and acknowledging the price
women pay during armed conflicts could serve as starting points for developing
an approach where 1 humanitarian considerations prevail. This would further expose that military necessity is an aspect of the male state which
oppresses and victimizes women.