Journal Citation:
23(2) COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW, 202-256 (2012)
Using the principles of property law, this
article examines honour-based violence
against women and the use of familial
honour as social capital. The author
suggests that societies around the world
treat honour as intangible property that
is collectively held by families,
controlled by males, and dependent on
female conformity to societal norms. Since
females cause the value of honour property
to fluctuate, males regulate their conduct
and use violence to restore its value.
Justice systems reinforce these practices
by offering reduced punishment for honour
crimes or permitting "heat of passion"
defences. The author proposes to redefine
honour in two ways. First, women should be
viewed as honour property holders. Second,
honour should not be determined by a
woman's sexuality. A possible response to
this redefinition is using stricter
criminal sanctions for honour crimes to
signal disapproval at recovering honour
through violence. Community-level
discourse denouncing honour crimes is also
required.