Journal Citation:
(Accepted Paper Series 03-25, 2014)
This article explores the inadequacy of
international human rights discourse to
effectively engage with the rights of
indigenous women. It refers to two
documents that confer rights on indigenous
womenthe United Nations Declaration on
the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
(2007); and the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
against Women (CEDAW) (1979)and argues
that, despite these internationally
recognized documents, indigenous women's
rights continue to be given inadequate
attention at both international and local
levels. Through an analysis of indigenous
womens rights in international law and
the work of the United Nations' Permanent
Forum on Indigenous Issues, and with
reference to feminist critiques of human
rights law, the article suggests that
indigenous human rights discourse in fact
perpetuates exclusions of and power
imbalances toward indigenous women.
Finally, the article puts forward the
Zapatista Women's Revolutionary Law as an
example of effective indigenous womens
rights developed by grassroots indigenous
women.