Journal Citation:
43 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 733-777 (2010).
This article focuses on the U.S. Supreme
Court's recent decision, in "U.S. v
Morrison", to strike down s.13,981 of the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) for
violating the Commerce Clause and the
State Action Doctrine. VAWA s.13,981
provides a civil remedy for victims of
gender-motivated violence against their
abusers. The article takes the position
that the Supreme Court should have upheld
the private right of action. The article
discusses the implications of this
decision and draws links to the United
States' international obligations under
the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) and customary
international law. It further discusses
the implications of the United States'
failure to ratify treaties such as the
Convention on the Elimination of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), as
well as the resultant lack of implementing
legislation. The article expresses concern
over the United States' credibility in the
realm of human rights, and holds that the
United States must focus on enacting
legislation to fulfill its international
obligations to restore its reputation as a
leader in human rights.