Journal Citation:
17 HARVARD WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL, 5-16 (1994)
In this article, the author examines how
sexual violence against women has
traditionally been kept outside of the
realm of violations of human rights. She
argues that crimes that fall under such
violations are crimes that are perpetrated
on men and women indiscriminately, whereas
sexual violence against women is legally
seen as 'private' and therefore, has not
been understood as a violation of women's
humanity. The exclusion of sexual violence
from violations of human rights, it is
argued, stems from the fact that, while
women are typically raped by individual
men and not by governments, most human
rights instruments empower states to act
against states, not individuals or groups
to act for themselves. Through the prism
of the genocidal conflict in the former
Yugoslavia, the author demonstrates that
rapes are more than 'private' crimes
perpetrated by individuals; they are an
instrument of the war, a method of ethnic
cleansing. Rape is both a violation of
human rights and a violence against women.
As a result, the author advocates in
favour of a radical shift in the way that
human rights apply to women: instead of
looking at human rights law to see how
much of what happens to women can be fit
into it, we should look at the reality of
women's lives first and hold human rights
law accountable to what women need.