Journal Citation:
26 (2) COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW, 182-223 (2014)
In this article, Bewicke explores
reparation policies following armed
conflict, specifically in terms of their
suitability to adequately address the
needs of girl child soldiers. The author
suggests that, even though reparation
jurisprudence is well-formed, there is a
conspicuous gap for girl child soldiers.
The author argues for a holistic approach
that places such girls at the centre of
the reparation process which she views as
necessary to begin the healing process.
Bewicke explores factors considered in
determining whether someone is a child
solider including age and duties
undertaken by the child. She also analyzes
other challenges in providing reparations
to child soldiers. Further, the author
argues that the Thomas Lubanga Dyilo case
decided by the International Criminal
Court is an important demonstration of the
tensions embedded in the current
reparation jurisprudence: neglecting girl
soldiers at the outset of the reparation
project results in diminishing efficacy of
the whole process itself.