Reference:
App. No. 46598/06, (2009)
Annotation:
The Tomasic decision affirmed the holding
in Kontrova that a failure to protect
women from domestic violence can result in
the violation of the right to life
(Article 2). The Court found such a
violation in this case on the basis that
death threats were not followed up on,
despite being made to officials during
psychiatric treatment in prison. The
applicants, relatives of the mother and
child victims M.T. and V.T., claimed that
the State failed to exercise due diligence
to protect the victims after M.T.s
husband was released from prison. The
husband was serving a jail sentence, along
with compulsory psychiatric treatment, for
threatening to kill his wife and their
baby with a bomb. Shortly after his
release, the husband shot and killed his
wife and baby. The Court held that State
officials, in this case, should have
required the husband to undergo a
psychiatric assessment before his release,
required the husband to undergo the
psychiatric treatment that he was
sentenced to while in prison, and should
have searched his vehicle and home after
the death threats were reported. A failure
to undertake all these actions amounted to
a violation of the States positive
obligations to uphold the right to life.