Journal Citation:
19(1) U.C. DAVIS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW & POLICY, 1-66 (2012)
This article discusses the interaction
between the tenets of multiculturalism and
liberalism, and questions how civil
government should treat culture- or
religion-based rights claims that are
incompatible with gender equality. It
creates three classifications in relation
to recent perspectives on
'multiculturalist-liberalism' and the
issue of veil-wearing by Muslim girls and
women. First, 'vision-impaired liberalism'
is supposedly blind to increasing harms to
women caused by preferential treatment of
religions. Second, 'monocular liberalism'
identifies gender inequalities resulting
from religious constraints, but is
optimistic about the self-corrective
mechanism of the liberal state. Third,
'binocular liberalism' insists upon
secular values and prioritization of
gender equality in the hierarchy of
rights. Ultimately, the authors argue that
a liberal state must first commit to
secularism as a precursor to both feminist
and anti-racist advancement.