Many women seek refugee protection fleeing
from forced marriages. However, because
there is no precedent establishing forced
marriage as a form of persecution, these
women often have to establish their claims on
related harms that already constitute
persecution, such as rape,. The article
discusses what constitutes forced marriage
and the development of requirements for
refugee protection. The author then examines
the meaning of persecution and how forced
marriage may fit within the definition.
Following this more general discussion, the
article analyzes a number of U.S. cases
involving forced marriage to explore the
treatment of forced marriage in asylum
adjudications. The analysis identifies a
number of factors in asylum adjudications
involving forced marriage, including legal
challenges and adjudicator misapprehensions.
It concludes that forced marriage as
persecution is barely addressed in U.S.
asylum cases. The author concludes that
forced marriages should be considered a form
of persecution under domestic and
international law since they deprive women of
the fundamental right to freely consent to
marriage.
Kim Thuy Seelinger, Forced Marriage and
Asylum: Perceiving the Invisible Harm (2010)
42:1 Colum HRL Rev 55.
Main menu
- Ask a Law Librarian
- About the Library
- Key Databases
- Research Guides
- Current Awareness
- Services
- Special Collections
- Betty Ho Collection
- Collection of Documents on Gender Discrimination and the Indian Act
- Collection of Documents Relating to Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women In Canada
- Faculty of Law Casebook Collection
- Indigenous Perspectives Collection
- Special Projects and Collections of Documents
- Tort Law & Social Equality
- Women's Human Rights Resources Programme (WHRR)