Journal Citation:
5(3) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 507-525 (2007)
By analyzing four international human
rights cases involving women, this article
considers how applying a gendered
perspective to constitutional law can
improve protection of women's human
rights. In MC v Bulgaria, Siliadin v
France, Huaman v Peru, and AT v Hungary,
international bodies adopted a gendered
perspective when considering the
application of the Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination
Against Women (CEDAW), the European
Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the
International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR). The authors
argue that courts interpreting
constitutional law should take into
account the specific situation of women by
recognizing the positive obligations of
the state and applying a dynamic
interpretation to protection of rights.